Gender Differences in Achievement Motivation: A Comparative Analysis across Learning Disabled and Non-Learning Disabled Student Populations

Authors

  • Jilsy P Department of Psychology, Desh Bhagat University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Dist. Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab, India Author
  • Dr Mansi Kapoor Supervisor, Department of Psychology, Desh Bhagat University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Dist. Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab, India Author

Keywords:

Achievement motivation, Learning Disability

Abstract

Achievement motivation refers to an individual’s inner drive to strive for success, attain excellence, and perform tasks to a standard of quality. Learning disability (LD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by persistent difficulties in acquiring and using academic skills such as reading, writing, or mathematics, despite adequate intelligence and educational opportunities. The present study aimed to examine gender variation in achievement motivation among children with and without learning disabilities. The study was conducted among 300 school-going children aged 8–12 years from Kerala, comprising students with learning disabilities and those without learning disabilities. Each group consisted of 75 males and 75 females, selected using a purposive sampling method. Achievement motivation was assessed using Ray’s Achievement Motivation Scale. The data were statistically analyzed using SPSS (Version 28). To test the stated hypothesis, that is, there will be a significant gender difference in achievement motivation among children with learning disabilities and there will be a significant gender difference in achievement motivation among children without learning disabilities, an independent samples t-test was employed. The results revealed that there is a significant gender difference in achievement motivation among children without learning disability and there is no significant difference in achievement motivation among children with learning disabilities, thereby rejecting the first hypothesis and supporting the second hypothesis of the study. The findings highlight that the impact of gender on achievement motivation is not universal but is significantly altered by the presence of a learning disability. The study demonstrates that while gender-based motivational gaps are prominent in children without disabilities, they are non-existent among those with learning disabilities. Consequently, educational strategies must move beyond ‘one size fits all’ models to prioritize inclusive, status specific interventions that address the unique motivational profiles of both groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Van Nostrand.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585–609.

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.

Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2019). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Geary, D. C. (2010). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. American Psychological Association.

Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(6), 631–645.

Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom. Developmental Psychology, 17(3), 300–312.

Heiman, T., & Kariv, D. (2004). Manifestations of learning disabilities in university students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 162–173.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2003). Student motivation in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 143(1), 23–38.

Klassen, R. M. (2002). A question of calibration: A review of the self-efficacy beliefs of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25(2), 88–103.

McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Van Nostrand.

Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 351–373.

Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Merrill Prentice Hall.

Rourke, B. P. (1993). Arithmetic disabilities, specific and otherwise. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(4), 214–226.

Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159–172.

Sideridis, G. D. (2005). Goal orientation, academic achievement, and depression. Educational Psychology, 25(1), 19–36.

Swanson, H. L., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2013). Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.

Downloads

Published

31-10-2025

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Jilsy P and Dr Mansi Kapoor, Trans., “Gender Differences in Achievement Motivation: A Comparative Analysis across Learning Disabled and Non-Learning Disabled Student Populations”, Int J Sci Res Sci & Technol, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 716–725, Oct. 2025, Accessed: Feb. 28, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://mail.ijsrst.com/index.php/home/article/view/IJSRST25126483